2.  The lock trade in 1865










In 1865 we have, thanks to J. C. Tildesley, a slice in time picture of the local industry.

Tildesely’s main classification of the lock trade is into the trade of Wolverhampton and that of Willenhall. Clearly they are both important trades in their own areas but he does not suggest that the scale of manufacturer is noticeably greater in one town than in the other. But he does see some clear distinctions between them. The first is that in Wolverhampton the locks are based on tumblers and levers and in Willenhall and elsewhere they are based on wards. Secondly the locks produced in Willenhall are "of inferior quality". Thirdly the lock trade in Willenhall is divided amongst "many masters, the majority of whom employ only some six or eight men or boys". This has resulted in considerable competition, exploited by purchasers to drive prices down, so that "excellence of workmanship has given way to rapidity of production". The implication is that Wolverhampton’s lock industry is based on much larger firms, though the only one which gets a mention is Messrs. Chubb and Son.

Brewood, Coven and Pendeford also get mention as making the ironwork for fine plate locks, which are completed in Wolverhampton. Short Heath and New Invention make cabinet locks "but the articles produced are much inferior to Wolverhampton make". The lock trade in Walsall "has much extended in recent years" and Wednesfield is noted as making some locks as well as keys, but in both places "the lock trade is only a supplementary brand of industry".

At this time, Tildesely records, the principal overseas markets are Australia and New Zealand. India is a large market for padlocks. And the Continent provides a market for brass and ornamental padlocks. The United States used to provide a considerable market, more than half the locks made in the district being sent there. But now their home industry was expanding and trade to the US was declining. But "the development of new empires, and the opening up of fresh fields of commerce in our colonies, augur well for this department of local industry".

There was foreign competition, mainly from America, France and Germany. The Americans use very fine casting sand which does away with the need for any filing of the castings, which enables locks to be made ten times faster. But their locks "are unenduring and insecure" and are little threat outside the USA. Continental locks are no better. Although they are elaborately decorated, they lack "the strength and practical usefulness" of English locks.

Even though Tildesley thinks it will take some time "before the French consumers will abandon their own flimsy decorative articles in favour of plain practical English locks" the example of these fancy foreigners does give Tildesley some cause for concern:  "neither …have locks and keys made in this district kept pace with the demand for decorative art workmanship, which is the natural result of the refining influence of an increasing civilisation, and the spread of education amongst the people". And "it cannot be denied … that Mr. Ruskin’s theory, on the union of art and handicraft, might he studied with advantage by the locksmiths of this district, to whose productions might be given increased symmetry and beauty, without in any way destroying their more practical qualities."

He also says that "perhaps no extensive branch of local industry has taken less advantage of the recent progress of mechanical science than the lock trade. In most cases, they are constructed now in precisely the same manner as they were twenty years ago. To the fact of the trade being so much in the hands of small capitalists, must be mainly attributed the lack of that enterprise and progression which have characterised other departments of local industry".

The lives of those working in the industry also has his attention, where he finds that things have "much improved of late years, but there is still room for amendment". Working hours were from 6 a.m. to 7 p.m. in winter and from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. in summer "but in too many instances those hours are exceeded". Only 10% of the workforce is women but the widespread employment of boys under the workhouse apprenticeship system causes concern, though there is less of it than there used to be and the boys are better treated.

Generally the blacksmiths work much better than they used to, even though they still drink the health of St. Monday – that is, they do not work on Monday, turning Sunday and Monday into a week end break. But they have taken advantage of the facilities for self-improvement offered to them and "in one lock factory, which may be taken as a fair example of the others in the district, 70 per cent. of the artisans are members of Friendly Societies, 50 per cent. can read and write, 15 per pent. are members of a Mechanics’ Institute, 10 per cent. have accounts with the Post Office Savings Bank, and 5 per cent. are the owners of the freehold cottages in which they reside."

Tildesely, who is not averse to including local folklore in his account, does not mention one still-remembered feature of Willenhall lock workers. They were said to spend so much of their lives hunched over a bench that they developed a permanent distortion of the spine. So many men were so afflicted that Willenhall was known as "Humpshire" and, it is even said that the pub benches had hollows in their backs to accommodate the humps. But no evidence of this curious furniture has ever been found. 

Many years later, another Tildesley, Norman W. Tildesley, adds a few details (in his History of Willenhall, Willenhall UDC, 1951, published "to commemorate the Festival of Britain") adds a few details, apparently from the same period. "The locksmiths were assisted by their wives and members of their families, together with one or two apprentices. Children in those days were set to work at the tender age of nine or ten years. They were first taught how to file and humped backs and twisted shoulders were the result of this early training. A considerable number of these children were placed as apprentices by the parochial officers. The lot of the parish apprentices was indeed a grievous one. Many of these lads came from the Tamworth Workhouse and at ten and eleven were apprenticed to the lockmakers to spend the next ten years as members of their households. Many of the masters were harsh and unscrupulous and looked upon these unfortunate children as a form of cheap labour which they could exploit to the full. The small cramped workshops, hard work, long hours and poor food wrought havoc with their frail bodies and the death rate amongst them was high, many of them perishing from consumption and other kindred complaints". Bad though this may be, it is worth remembering that the locksmith’s own children may have fared no better and the apprentices became part of a whole household that was barely scraping a living.

Return to the Previous Page

Return to Locks and Keys   Proceed to Later History